While any trucking accident
can have tragic consequences and can be a result of negligent behaviors, when
the actions which caused the collision were deliberate, malicious or willful,
punitive damages may be warranted. In other words, when an accident is not an
accident but the result of a deliberate action on the part of the trucking
company, truck driver, truck manufacturer, truck loading company or the company
responsible for truck maintenance, the attorney may seek punitive damages on behalf
of the victim. Punitive damages are intended to punish reckless or willful
behaviors as well as to deter the same type of behaviors in the future. Some
examples of behaviors which would warrant punitive damages include:
·
Falsifying driver logbooks so the driver could
exceed the mandated hours of service
·
Drivers who use illegal drugs in order to remain
alert and awake
·
Reckless driving behaviors such as weaving in
and out of traffic, exceeding the speed limit or driving while under the
influence
·
Trucking companies who attempt to conceal or
destroy evidence which would show negligence on the part of the driver or
trucking company following a truck accident
·
Trucking companies who show a deliberate pattern
of safety violations
·
Truck drivers or trucking companies who knowingly
drive with faulty brake systems or worn-out tires
·
Trucking companies who put drivers on the road
who are inadequately trained
·
Trucking companies who neglect to perform proper
background checks on their drivers
This is only a partial list of
behaviors which could be considered reckless or deliberate, thereby warranting
punitive damages. The primary cause of large truck accidents is fatigued
drivers. In fact, over a third of all truck accidents can be directly tied to a
driver who had been driving for too many hours. This level of exhaustion can
lead to inattention, excess speed or a failure to compensate for inclement
weather or congested traffic conditions.
Punitive Damages Increasing in Trucking Collisions
Punitive damages are becoming
increasingly prevalent in trucking litigation due to the severity of injuries
resulting from truck collisions. Early identification of facts which could
sustain a claim of punitive damages is crucial to the overall litigation
strategy. When assessing the potential of punitive damages, the judge and jury
may consider the character of the defendant’s act as well as the extent of harm
done to the plaintiff and the nature of that harm. The jury will also consider
whether the defendant deliberately caused the harm. Many juries are hesitant to
impose punitive damages on the trucking company for the conduct of the
company’s employee (the truck driver).
Even so, if the truck driver
was obviously unfit and the trucking company was reckless in the driver’s
employment, juries may agree that punitive damages are warranted. Particularly
when the trucking company was fully aware of their driver’s potentially
dangerous habits yet failed to properly supervise that driver, punitive damages
from the trucking company could be appropriate. This could occur when the
trucking company knew the driver was exceeding the hours of service or knew the
driver habitually used drugs in order to remain awake or alert. If you are the
victim of a Texas trucking accident, a Houston 18-wheeler accident lawyer may
be able to protect your rights and preserve evidence in your case.
No comments:
Post a Comment